data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aac44/aac44ead8f22069ffec85d4720e5215217273634" alt="Operation Geronimo: Assassination of Osama Bin Laden and Its Legal Implications"
Operation Geronimo
Introduction
The operation of assassinating Osama Bin Laden was deadly, but the United States had to do it. Osama Bin Laden was the first commander and founder of the Qaeda terrorist group. The American forces killed Osama at his base in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The operation was code-named after an American commander and warrior, Geronimo, who battled against the United States in the late 1990s. The operation was very successful, but people questioned whether President Obama had no legal authority. This is because the United States did not communicate prior to the Pakistan government before operating.
The act created issues in the relationship between the two countries (Shaheed et al., 2019). There have been rumors that the United States will send troops to Pakistan if the country’s nuclear facilities are attacked by terrorists seeking revenge for Osama bin Laden’s death. Tensions between the United States and Pakistan have escalated due to this. Navy SEALs from the United States Joint Special Operations Command conceived and carried out the mission (JSOC). This operation occurred at Osama’s place in Abbottabad, where he has been hiding for approximately five years. The United States Navy SEALs killed the most wanted terrorist and carried his body. This essay discusses President Obama’s constitutional authority to carry out the operation.
Body
The operation comprised two phases. During the first phase, two black hawk helicopters flew and landed in Pakistan airspace near where they suspected Osama Bin Laden was hiding. The SEALs then broke into the structure where Osama hid within the compound. The operation progressed to the second phase, where a gunfight broke out between the SEALs and Osama Bin Laden’s guards. Osama and some of his companions died during the gun battle, adding up to 3000 lives. Since Osama Bin Laden was the most wanted terrorist in the world, it was a massive victory for the United States to take away his life. The death of Osama Bin Laden was a significant setback for al-Qaeda because he was both the commander and spiritual guide of the group. The operation was met with opposition because it broke Pakistan’s rule of assassinating terrorists without the government’s consent and knowledge (Runkle, 2011).
Despite conjectures of a US-Pak sympathetic to sacrifice bin Laden, which would facilitate the US extraction from Af-Pak and boost President Obama’s rankings for endorsement, the US Navy Seals’ Operation Geronimo, led deep inside Pakistan on 02 May 2011, will go down as a special operation in the histories of the US Special Forces (USSF) (Lieutenant General PC Katoch, 2020). Some internet users even believe that Osama died six months ago, that his body has been conserved in Tarbela, and that it took the Seals forty minutes to find his safe house because a Pakistani helicopter had to fly in the body.
Moreover, the operation was conducted in a way that complied with the rules that are currently in place to make the management of international relations easier. The goal was to optimize the surgical procedure. This step was taken to simplify fostering diplomatic ties between countries. The United States has long acknowledged the validity of Article 51 of the UN Charter, which guarantees everyone the right to use force in self-defense in the event of an attack (Ferrari, 2017). The United States has long recognized this principle as accurate. The United States of America has officially acknowledged that fact. The United States of America has long recognized the practical validity of this principle. The United States of America has been caught engaging in such behavior on numerous occasions. If a country faces an immediate threat to its national security, it could use the concept of “national security exigency” to justify using force. In appropriate situations, nations may use this justification. The Geneva Convention on the Use of Force in International Conflict in Geneva, Switzerland, lends credence to this view.
The removal of Osama bin Laden was crucial in stopping the bloodshed and preventing further attacks against the United States. Planned with great care, the operation minimized the number of civilian casualties expected and ensured that no more of Pakistan’s sovereignty was violated than was necessary to accomplish the mission. These two goals were realized thanks to careful preparation. Some people have lodged complaints about what they see as an attack on Pakistan’s national government’s right to legislate within its borders. Nonetheless, Pakistan has become a hub for terrorist activities, and the government there has been unwilling or unable to confront the issue effectively. US troops involved in the operation said they had no plans to occupy or assume control of Pakistan when it was over, and they informed the Pakistani government of the results. After the investigation was completed and the operation was deemed a success, Pakistan was told of the results. After the mission, intelligence on recent regional events was shared with Pakistan (Runkle, 2011).
In addition, President Obama conferred with his department’s legal advisers to weigh the possible legal ramifications of the operation before giving his approval. The purpose of this was to look into the potential for legal action. The purpose of doing this analysis was to determine whether or not doing so would have any legal consequences. The country’s highest-ranking lawyer, the Attorney General, reviewed the operation and found that it did not break any laws. As the nation’s top lawyer, the Attorney General made this decision, it must be correct. The Attorney General has stated that the operation was conducted in a way that met or exceeded all applicable domestic and international laws. This was accomplished by conducting the operation in a way that met the standards of both bodies of law. This result can be reached because the method adhered to these norms. This was attained by ensuring that the procedure was carried out to guarantee full compliance with the requirements established for the operation. This was achieved by doing the action in a way that guaranteed its strict adherence to the norms.
Conclusions
Since the operation was carried out according to international law, President Obama was within his legal rights to order the action taken to kill Osama bin Laden. Also, the action was carried out following international law. Also, the operation was carried out under the regulations that control the international community. Also, the operation was carried out per the laws governing world society. This was done to avoid any possible legal repercussions. Also, the mission was completed while adhering to the rules that govern the international community. Because there could be negative legal ramifications, it was done in this manner. From the perspective of the greater war against terrorism, the mission was a wise course of action to take and ought to have been executed.
In his capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the President of the United States is responsible for maintaining the general welfare of the American people. The President is the highest-ranking official in the nation; hence he has control over this position. Since he is the nation’s highest-ranking official, the President is ultimately in charge of this responsibility. It was feasible to minimize the number of civilian casualties by adequately planning and carrying out the operation, which helped Pakistan maintain its independence. Also, the scenario directly led to fewer overall civilian casualties. This came about as a result of favorable circumstances. The fact that the mission was successful and came to a happy conclusion shows how committed the United States of America is to the fight against terrorism and how eager it is to take those culpable for attacks against Americans accountable.
References
Lieutenant General PC Katoch. (2020). Operation Geronimo. USI. Retrieved March 9, 2023, from https://usiofindia.org/publication/usi-journal/operation-geronimo-an-analysis/
Ferrari, S. (2017). Congratulations! you have killed Osama bin Laden!! University of Illinois Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252038860.003.0010
Runkle, B. (2011). Wanted dead or alive: Manhunts from Geronimo to Bin Laden. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shaheed, S. H., Mi, S., Soherwordi, & Khattak. (2019). Operation Geronimo: Assassination of Osama Bin – Proquest. Proquest. Retrieved March 9, 2023, from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1008664344